Wade v. Key Bank of Vermont
Traci Wade |
Key Bank of Vermont |
2:2019cv00172 |
September 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
William K Sessions |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed: Key Bank of Vermont waiver sent on 10/24/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Watts, Jr., Norman) |
Filing 14 STIPULATED DISCOVERY LETTER SENT re: no stipulated discovery schedule filed; case will be set for a scheduling conference unless stipulated schedule is filed. (jam) |
Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Key Bank of Vermont filed by Traci Wade. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint (red-lined))(law) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of First Amended Complaint by Traci Wade (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint - standard, #2 Proposed Amended Complaint - redline, #3 Certificate of Service)(Watts, Jr., Norman) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition to #10 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss filed by Traci Wade. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Watts, Jr., Norman) Text clarified on 10/15/2019 (law). |
Filing 10 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss filed by Key Bank of Vermont.(Vanderzanden, Danielle) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Key Bank of Vermont re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal and Supporting Documents) (originally filed 9/27/2019 in state court)(law) |
Filing 8 FILING FEE Paid. (originally filed 9/9/2019 in state court) (law) |
Filing 7 NOTICE to Plaintiff regarding filing fee. (originally filed 8/28/2019 in state court)(law) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Assigned Docket Number. (originally filed 8/28/2019 in state court)(law) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Key Bank of Vermont filed by Traci Wade. (originally filed 8/26/2019 in state court) (law) |
Filing 4 RECEIVED FILE and certified copy of docket sheet from State Court. (law) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a) by Key Bank of Vermont. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(law) |
Filing 2 LETTER to Vermont Superior Court, Civil Division, Chittenden Unit requesting original case file and certified docket sheet. (law) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Key Bank of Vermont from Vermont Superior Court, Civil Division, Chittenden Unit, case number 754-8-19 Cncv. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wade v. Key Bank of Vermont | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Traci Wade | |
Represented By: | Norman E. Watts, Jr., Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Key Bank of Vermont | |
Represented By: | Danielle Y. Vanderzanden, Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.