Jenkins v. United States Department of Justice
Janet Jenkins |
United States Department of Justice |
2:2020cv00059 |
April 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
William K Sessions |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #4 Amended Complaint With Written Consent filed by Janet Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diego A. Soto, #2 Proposed Second Amended Complaint, #3 Proposed Second Amended Complaint Redline Version)(Langrock, Frank) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #8 Summons Returned Executed as to USA. The dates in the docket entry have been clarified. It now reads: United States Department of Justice served on 6/1/2020, answer due 7/31/2020. (law) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. United States Department of Justice served on 6/1/2020, answer due 7/31/2020.(Langrock, Frank) Dates clarified on 6/9/2020 (law). |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 5/27/2020. (This is a text-only Order.) (eae) (entry updated to include the ruling on 5/27/2020)(jam). |
Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by United States Department of Justice.(Turner, Jason) |
ISSUED Summons as to United States Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General.(law) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #4 Amended Complaint filed by Janet Jenkins. Exhibit 3 was omitted at the time of filing. The exhibit is now attached to #4 and this entry. (law) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United States Department of Justice filed by Janet Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(jam) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/18/2020: #3 Exhibit 3) (law). Text clarified on 5/19/2020 (law). |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #2 Summons Returned Executed. Docket text has been corrected to read United States Department of Justice served on 5/4/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (law) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS RETURNED Executed. United States Department of Justice served on 5/4/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Langrock, Frank) Text clarified on 5/15/2020 (law). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Justice filed by Janet Jenkins.Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jenkins v. United States Department of Justice | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janet Jenkins | |
Represented By: | Frank H. Langrock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Department of Justice | |
Represented By: | Jason M. Turner, AUSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.