Alexander v. Vermont DOC
| Troy Daniel Alexander |
| Vermont DOC, Bob Arkley, Officer Paxton and Officer Musure |
| 2:2020cv00123 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| John M Conroy |
| Christina Reiss |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT (unsigned) against Bob Arkley, Officer Paxton, Officer Musure filed by Troy Daniel Alexander.(law)
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT against Vermont DOC filed by Troy Daniel Alexander. (eh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. It is recommended the court dismiss Alexander's #4 Complaint as barred by sovereign immunity. It is further recommended that Alexander be granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the court's ruling on this Report and Recommendation. Objections due within 14 days of service.Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 9/14/2020. (eh)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF PRO SE APPEARANCE by Troy Daniel Alexander. (eh)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Troy Daniel Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Troy Alexander, #2 Proposed Complaint (image is sealed), #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (eh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
