Peterson v. Condos et al
| Reuell E. Peterson and Reuel E. Peterson |
| Jim Condos and Phil Scott |
| 2:2021cv00027 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| William K Sessions |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Jim Condos, Phil Scott filed by Reuel E. Peterson. (law) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED under 28:1915(e)(2)(B) and may file an amended complaint by 5/6/2021. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 4/6/2021. (law)
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Reuel E. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Reuel Peterson)(law) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER denying #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may re-file an IFP Application; failure to file by 3/12/2021 shall result in dismissal of his case. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 2/12/2021. (law)
|
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Reuel E. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Reuel E. Peterson, #2 Notice of Pro Se Appearance, #3 Proposed Complaint (document is sealed), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
