United States of America v. $79,539 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $79,539 in U.S. Currency
Case Number: 2:2021cv00100
Filed: March 31, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Presiding Judge: William K Sessions
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY REMOVAL: Document 14 has been removed as duplicative of #12 . (law)
May 19, 2021 Filing 14 Entry removed from the docket
May 19, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re: #1 Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem and #9 Notice of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to David S. Shor, Esq. (Attachments: #1 Return Receipt)(Kerest, Nikolas) Links added on 5/19/2021 (law).
May 19, 2021 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re: #1 Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem and #6 Notice of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to Mark A. Kaplan, Esq. (Attachments: #1 Return Receipt)(Kerest, Nikolas) Links added on 5/19/2021 (law).
May 4, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #10 Declaration of Publication filed by United States of America. The document has been replaced for corrections. The corrected document is attached to #10 and this entry. (law)
May 4, 2021 Filing 10 DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(Kerest, Nikolas) (Main Document 10 replaced on 5/4/2021) (law).
April 5, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to David S. Shor, Esq. by United States of America (Kerest, Nikolas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to Sheik Louison by United States of America (Kerest, Nikolas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to Shail Louison by United States of America (Kerest, Nikolas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to Mark A. Kaplan, Esq. by United States of America (Kerest, Nikolas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to Evanda Louison by United States of America (Kerest, Nikolas)
April 5, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings to Gemma Charles by United States of America (Kerest, Nikolas)
March 31, 2021 Filing 3 WARRANT for Arrest In Rem Returned Executed on 3/31/2021. (law)
March 31, 2021 Filing 2 ISSUED Warrant for Arrest In Rem. Signed by Deputy Clerk. (Document is Sealed) (law)
March 31, 2021 Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT OF FORFEITURE filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(law)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $79,539 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $79,539 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Nikolas P. Kerest, AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?