Rivard v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jeffrey M. Rivard
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2021cv00184
Filed: July 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY REMOVAL. Document 19 has been removed as duplicative of Doc #18 (jlh)
September 16, 2021 Filing 19 Entry has been removed from the docket.
September 16, 2021 Filing 18 SUR-REPLY to #14 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint for Failure to State a Claim or, in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jeffrey M. Rivard. (jbr)
September 1, 2021 Filing 17 REPLY to Response to #14 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint for Failure to State a Claim or, in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Charles Schaenman)(Oeltjen, Natasha)
August 16, 2021 Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition to #14 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint for Failure to State a Claim or, in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jeffrey M. Rivard. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Statement, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts, #5 Response to Affidavit of Carol A. Rozen, #6 Certificate of Service, #7 Exhibits)(kp) Text clarified on 8/19/2021 (law).
August 9, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant by Social Security Administration re #14 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint for Failure to State a Claim or, in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Oeltjen, Natasha) Text clarified on 8/9/2021 (law).
August 9, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint for Failure to State a Claim or, in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Statement of Undisputed Facts, #3 Declaration of Carol Rozen)(Oeltjen, Natasha). Added MOTION for Summary Judgment on 8/9/2021 (law).
July 21, 2021 Filing 12 CASE TRANSFERRED IN electronically from District of Maine; Case Number 2:21-cv-00128.
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE mooting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #7 Motion to Change Venue; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re #8 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
July 12, 2021 Filing 10 Response to Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #8 Report and Recommended Decision, filed by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER. (OELTJEN, NATASHA) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
July 12, 2021 ***Deadlines terminated: objection to Report and Recommended Decision deadline (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
July 12, 2021 ***Motions Taken Under Advisement: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JEFFREY M RIVARD, #7 MOTION to Change Venue filed by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, #7 MOTION to Change Venue (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 29, 2021 Filing 9 Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #8 Report and Recommended Decision filed by JEFFREY M RIVARD. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 7/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 25, 2021 Filing 8 RECOMMENDED DECISION ON MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JEFFREY M RIVARD, #7 MOTION to Change Venue filed by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Objections to R&R due by 7/9/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (slg) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 24, 2021 ***Motions terminated: #5 MOTION Hearing for discovery dispute filed by JEFFREY M RIVARD. Motion terminated as it was filed in error in the wrong case. The motion is on file as ECF No. 5 in case 2:21-cv-130-GZS (mnd) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 22, 2021 ***MOTIONS REFERRED #7 MOTION to Change Venue Motions referred to JOHN H. RICH III. (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 22, 2021 ***Deadlines terminated: pro se ready deadline for response to motion to change venue (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 11, 2021 ***Deadlines terminated: response deadline to motion to change venue (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 11, 2021 *** Set Private Follow-Up Deadline : ProSe/Prisoner Motion Ready for referral on 6/18/2021. Response to motion to change venue due by 6/18/2021 (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 4, 2021 ***MOTIONS REFERRED #5 MOTION Hearing for discovery dispute Motions referred to JOHN H. RICH III. (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
June 4, 2021 ***Deadlines terminated: response deadline to motion no. 5 (lrt) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 20, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Change Venue by SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Responses due by 6/10/2021. (OELTJEN, NATASHA) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 20, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by NATASHA OELTJEN on behalf of SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER (OELTJEN, NATASHA) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 14, 2021 ***MOTIONS REFERRED #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motions referred to JOHN H. RICH III. (bfa) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 13, 2021 Filing 5 **FILED IN ERROR** MOTION Hearing for discovery dispute by JEFFREY M RIVARD Responses due by 6/3/2021. (bfa) Modified on 6/24/2021 docket entry modified by the Clerk's Office to reflect that it was filed in error in the wrong case. The motion is on file as ECF No. 5 in case 2:21-cv-130-GZS (mnd). [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 13, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JEFFREY M RIVARD (bfa) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/23/2021) (mnd). Modified on 6/23/2021 to replace the main document as the version originally uploaded was missing a page (mnd). [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 13, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by JEFFREY M RIVARD (bfa) (Main Document 3 replaced on 6/23/2021) (mnd). Modified on 6/23/2021 to remove extra, unrelated page from the main document (mnd). [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 13, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, filed by JEFFREY M RIVARD. (Service of Process Deadline 8/11/2021) (Attachments: #1 certificate of service, #2 envelope)(bfa) [Transferred from Maine on 7/21/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivard v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey M. Rivard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Natasha Oeltjen, SAUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?