Wolfe v. Thibault
| Kyle T. Wolfe and AS Human Services |
| Rory Thibault |
| 2:2022cv00143 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Kevin J Doyle |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Rory Thibault filed by Kyle T. Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Resume) (eh) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing #4 Complaint. Plaintiff may file a proposed Amended Complaint raising all claims against Defendant and listing one of the docket numbers in the caption of this Order. The proposed Amended Complaint will also be subject to review under 1915(a)(1). The proposed Amended Complaint must be filed no later than 9/22/2022. Failure to do so shall result in dismissal of both cases (see related case: 2:22-cv-154). Signed by Judge Kevin J. Doyle on 8/23/2022. (eh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Request Injunctive Relief filed by Kyle T. Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion #1, #2 Affidavit in Support of Motion #2, #3 Affidavit in Support of Motion #3, #4 Affidavit in Support of Motion #4) (eh) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Kyle T. Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint (image is sealed), # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (eh) Document/text clarified on 8/1/2022 (eh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
