Vowinkel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
| Sheila Vowinkel |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance |
| ENE Evaluator |
| 2:2023cv00011 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| William K Sessions |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ASSIGNED Early Neutral Evaluator: James W. Spink, Esq. (law) |
| Filing 8 EVALUATOR SELECTION Response by Liberty Mutual Insurance(Ferrigno, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED Executed. Liberty Mutual Insurance served on 2/7/2023, answer due 2/28/2023.(Sherrer, Thomas) Text clarified on 2/27/2023 (law). |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 2/23/2023. (This is a text-only Order.) (eae)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance.(Simon, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 ENE LETTER re: Potential Evaluators sent; responses due by 3/13/2023. (law) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew A. Ferrigno, Esq on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance.(Ferrigno, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Liberty Mutual Insurance.(Simon, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Liberty Mutual Insurance filed by Sheila Vowinkel. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
