Wadseriya et al v. Garland et al
| Amirali Wadseriya, Nazia Wadseriya, Suryaben Kantilal Patel, Ramesh Bipinchadra Kabra, Naresh Maheshchandra Patel, Geetaben Naresh Patel, Keyur Nareshkumar Patel, Harshadkumar Arvindbhai Patel, Vinu Balasundaram Balan, Hiteshkumar Bholabhai Patel, Dharmishthaben Hiteshkumar Patel, Lenin Padmanabhan Potamparambil and Renish Kamdar |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski and Christopher A. Wray |
| 2:2023cv00073 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A Wray, Laura B. Zuchowski filed by Nazia Wadseriya, Ramesh Bipinchadra Kabra, Keyur Nareshkumar Patel, Harshadkumar Arvindbhai Patel, Dharmishthaben Hiteshkumar Patel, Lenin Padmanabhan Potamparambil, Naresh Maheshchandra Patel, Amirali Wadseriya, Hiteshkumar Bholabhai Patel, Vinu Balasundaram Balan, Renish Kamdar, Geetaben Naresh Patel, Suryaben Kantilal Patel. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
