Loomis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Heather Loomis |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration-Office of the General Counsel |
| 2:2023cv00153 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Assented-To Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) with Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Commissioner. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 8/21/2023. (sjl)
|
| Filing 4 ASSENTED-TO MOTION for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) with Reversal and Remand of the Cause to the Commissioner filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lechleitner, Andreea) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Administrative Record by Commissioner of Social Security. (Disc on file in Clerk's Office) (sp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andreea L. Lechleitner, SAUSA appearing for Commissioner of Social Security (Paperless filing)(Lechleitner, Andreea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Heather Loomis. Commissioner of Social Security answer due in 60 days. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
