Patel v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Sarthak Pareshkumar Patel |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 2:2023cv00219 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 7/31/2023, answer due 9/29/2023; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/31/2023, answer due 9/29/2023.(Casazza, Christopher) Modified on 8/24/2023 to clarify text (sjl). |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Christopher M. Casazza. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 7/28/2023. (This is a text-only Order.) (jal)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Christopher M. Casazza, Esq. filed by Sarthak Pareshkumar Patel (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Christopher M. Casazza, Esq., #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services filed by Sarthak Pareshkumar Patel. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (sjl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
