Patel et al v. Jaddou
| Chiragkumar Suryakant Patel, Rajeshbhai Ambalal Patel, Vasantkumar Bhikhabai Patel, Shubh Pankajbhai Patel, Krina Pankajkumar Patel, Kajalben Rameshkumar Patel, Maulikkumar Vinodchandra Modi, Nileshkumar Kanubhai Patel, Nileshkumar Lalbhai Patel, Navinchandra Kalidas Patel, Krunal Bharatkumar Patel, Sanjaykumar Bhanubhai Patel, Sarfaraz Yusuf Memon, Ashmiben Bhavin Bhatt and Kamleshkumar Manilal Patel |
| Ur M. Jaddou |
| 2:2023cv00345 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Under the APA against Ur M. Jaddou filed by Kajalben Rameshkumar Patel, Krunal Bharatkumar Patel, Shubh Pankajbhai Patel, Nileshkumar Lalbhai Patel, Chiragkumar Suryakant Patel, Sanjaykumar Bhanubhai Patel, Maulikkumar Vinodchandra Modi, Kamleshkumar Manilal Patel, Ashmiben Bhavin Bhatt, Sarfaraz Yusuf Memon, Rajeshbhai Ambalal Patel, Krina Pankajkumar Patel, Nileshkumar Kanubhai Patel, Navinchandra Kalidas Patel, Vasantkumar Bhikhabai Patel. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (sjl) Modified on 8/22/2023 to clarify text (sjl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
