Morgan v. The Burton Corporation
| David Morgan |
| The Burton Corporation doing business as Burton Snowboards |
| 2:2023cv00366 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #15 Reply to Response to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Exhibit 1 has been replaced to fix illegible PDF headers. The corrected document is now attached to #15 as well as this entry. (jh) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by The Burton Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Soule, Stephen) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/24/2023) (jh). |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Edward J. McAndrew. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 10/19/2023. (This is a text-only Order.) (jal)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Edward J. McAndrew, Esq. filed by The Burton Corporation (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Edward J. McAndrew, #2 Exhibit 1)(jh) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 and #10 MOTIONS for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Lynn A. Toops and Evan M. Mannering, respectively. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 10/12/2023. (This is a text-only Order.) (jal)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by David Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (sjl) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Evan M. Mannering, Esq. filed by The Burton Corporation (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Evan M. Mannering, #2 Attachment (Certificates of Good Standing))(jh) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Lynn A. Toops filed by David Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Lynn A. Toops, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service)(law) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing a Notice of Removal by The Burton Corporation. (originally filed 8/31/2023 in state court) (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Certificate of Service) (sjl) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed: The Burton Corporation waiver sent on 8/3/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. (originally filed 8/3/2023 in state court) (sjl) |
| Filing 6 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against The Burton Corporation filed by David Morgan. (originally filed 7/19/2023 in state court) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit AA, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit A) (sjl) |
| Filing 5 RECEIVED FILE and certified copy of docket sheet from State Court. (sjl) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by The Burton Corporation (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Soule, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Vermont Superior Court, Chittenden Unit, Civil Div request original case file and certified docket sheet. (law) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a) by The Burton Corporation. (law) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Burton Corporation from Vermont Superior Court, Civil Division, Chittenden Unit, case number 23-CV-03080. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
