Castro v. Copeland-Hanzas et al
| John Anthony Castro |
| Sarah Copeland-Hanzas and Donald John Trump |
| 2:2023cv00453 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of 5th & 14th Amendements |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REISSUED Summons(es) as to Sarah Copeland-Hanzas, Donald John Trump.(sp) |
| REISSUED Summons(es) as to Sarah Copeland-Hanzas, Donald John Trump.(sp) |
Filing 3
ORDER on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #1 ). The court DENIES the motion for a temporary restraining order. The court will consider the request for a preliminary injunction, including consideration of the standing arguments which have proved fatal to similar claims by this plaintiff, after service of process and an appearance by defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 10/11/2023. (sjl)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION (Pro se) to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Rights filed by John Anthony Castro. (sjl) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Sarah Copeland-Hanzas, Donald John Trump filed by John Anthony Castro. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sjl) Modified on 10/2/2023 to clarify text (sjl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
