Vadsariya et al v. Garland et al
| Murad Abdul Vadsariya, Asrafbahen Murad Vadsariya, Aditya Murad Vadsariya, Ajaykumar Sureshbhai Patel, Safin Tajdin Rajwani, Maheshkumar Babulal Patel, Hasumatiben Maheshkumar Patel, Pal Maheshkumar Patel, Alnoor Jalalbhai Virani Lnu, Liliyan Alnoor Virani, Rameez Kherani and Neha Rahimbhai Nathwani |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski and Christopher A. Wray |
| 2:2023cv00535 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray, Laura B. Zuchowski filed by Aditya Murad Vadsariya, Pal Maheshkumar Patel, Murad Abdul Vadsariya, Maheshkumar Babulal Patel, Safin Tajdin Rajwani, Alnoor Jalalbhai Virani Lnu, Liliyan Alnoor Virani, Asrafbahen Murad Vadsariya, Neha Rahimbhai Nathwani, Hasumatiben Maheshkumar Patel, Ajaykumar Sureshbhai Patel, Rameez Kherani. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (sjl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
