Samnani et al v. Garland et al
Alfaz Ferozbhai Samnani, Ferozeruda Samnani, Davinder Kumar Jangra, Priyank Maheshkumar Goswami, Ranjanben Maheshkumar Gosai, Maheshkumar Gosai, Ashishkumar Sedhabhai Patel, Ashaben Govindbhai Patel, Sabira Merchant, Ankitkumar Baldevbhai Patel, Parulben Rameshbhai Patel, Chandreshkumar Govindbhai Patel and Harshidaben Chandreshkumar Patel |
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski and Christopher A. Wray |
2:2023cv00536 |
October 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Geoffrey W Crawford |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray, Laura B. Zuchowski filed by Davinder Kumar Jangra, Ashaben Govindbhai Patel, Alfaz Ferozbhai Samnani, Maheshkumar Gosai, Ranjanben Maheshkumar Gosai, Sabira Merchant, Ankitkumar Baldevbhai Patel, Ferozeruda Samnani, Chandreshkumar Govindbhai Patel, Harshidaben Chandreshkumar Patel, Ashishkumar Sedhabhai Patel, Priyank Maheshkumar Goswami, Parulben Rameshbhai Patel. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (sjl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.