Patel v. Garland et al
| Arvindkumar Naranbhai Patel |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Director Laura B. Zuchowski |
| 2:2024cv00308 |
| March 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Lucy Lu. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 3/25/2024. (This is a text-only Order.) (jal)
|
| Filing 3 CASE assigned to Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford. (law) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appearance Pro Hac Vice of Lucy Lu (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number AVTDC-1897994) filed by Arvindkumar Naranbhai Patel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order) (Smith, Jennille) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski filed by Arvindkumar Naranbhai Patel. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AVTDC-1897990) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons as to Merrick Garland, #4 Proposed Summons as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #5 Proposed Summons as to Laura B. Zuchowski, #6 Proposed Summons as to Alejandro Mayorkas, #7 Proposed Summons as to U.S. Attorney) (Smith, Jennille) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
