Patel et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Chandrakant D. Patel, Kusumben C. Patel, Megha C. Patel and Sunny C. Patel |
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
2:2024cv00678 |
June 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Geoffrey W Crawford |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MOTION for Appearance Pro Hac Vice of Christopher M. Casazza (Filing fee $ 150 receipt number AVTDC-1936580) filed by Chandrakant D. Patel, Kusumben C. Patel, Megha C. Patel, Sunny C. Patel (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Christopher M. Casazza, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Forman, Cory) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services filed by Sunny C. Patel, Chandrakant D. Patel, Megha C. Patel, Kusumben C. Patel. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AVTDC-1936247) (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Attachment Summons as to USCIS, #7 Attachment Summons as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #8 Attachment Summons as to US Attorney's Office, #9 Attachment Summons as to US Attorney General)(Casazza, Christopher) |
Case assigned to Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford. (kac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.