Doe v. South Burlington School District et al
| John Doe and Robert Lafayette |
| Tom Piper, South Burlington School District and Sol Bayer-Pact |
| 2:2024cv00779 |
| July 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Sex Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT - #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED. Even if plaintiff was granted IFP status, however, the proposed Complaint would be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Litigants (appeal period expires 9/4/2024)) (eh) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Case. Plaintiff is warned not to continue to attempt to file claims on his minor son's behalf without the required representation of counsel. This case is CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Geoffrey W Crawford on 7/30/2024. (eh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PRO SE APPEARANCE by John Doe. (sjl) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Proposed Motion for Guardian Ad Litem, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (sjl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
