Caleidoscope Communications Corp. v. FairPoint Communications Corp.
Plaintiff: Caleidoscope Communications Corp.
Defendant: FairPoint Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2008cv00279
Filed: June 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Rutland Office
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RULING: denying 5 Motion to Dismiss. Parties shall jointly prepare and file a proposed discovery schedule/order by 6/30/2009. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 06/16/2009. (wjf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caleidoscope Communications Corp. v. FairPoint Communications Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caleidoscope Communications Corp.
Represented By: Daniel L. Burchard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FairPoint Communications, Inc.
Represented By: Eric A. Poehlmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?