Abend Family Limited Partnership v. NGM Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Abend Family Limited Partnership
Defendant: NGM Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2013cv00008
Filed: January 11, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Rutland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Geoffrey W. Crawford
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ordered that all claims against NGM are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 11/13/2014. (esb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abend Family Limited Partnership v. NGM Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abend Family Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NGM Insurance Company
Represented By: John Paul Faignant, Esq.
Represented By: William T. Treas, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?