Top Ridge Investments, LLC v. Anichini, Inc. et al
| Top Ridge Investments, LLC |
| Anichini, Inc, Anichini Hospitality, Inc., Anichini Retail, Inc. and Susan Dollenmaier |
| Royal Heritage House, LLC, Jeffrey Tauber and Top Ridge Investments, LLC |
| Anichini Retail, Inc., Anichini Hospitality, Inc., Anichini, Inc and Susan Dollenmaier |
| 5:2016cv00076 |
| March 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Rutland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Geoffrey W. Crawford |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
DECISION granting in part and denying in part 152 Motion for Attorney Fees, costs, interest and penalties. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 9/26/2018. (esb)
|
|
Filing
127
DECISION granting 108 Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony and Report of Defendants' Putative Expert Terry Dorman on the basis both of a lack of professional qualifications and the shortcomings and gaps in his methodology. Signed by Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 11/30/2017. (esb)
|
|
Filing
82
OPINION AND ORDER denying 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Third-Party 67 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, which the court is treating as a MOTION for Summary Judgment, is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 7/14/2017. (pjl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
