Hoover v. United States of America
| 5:2019cv00052 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Rutland Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER Accepting and Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), a certificate of appealability is Denied and any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 1/29/2020. (esb)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending judgement re 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus be entered in favor of the United States and that the case be closed. Objections due within 14 days of service. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 1/2/2020. (eh)
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION AND ORDER: Petitioner's 18 MOTION to Amend is GRANTED. Any amended § 2255 motion must be filed within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 10/15/2019. (hbc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hoover v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
