Abdul-Kareem v. Superior Court Windham County et al
Petitioner: Misbah Abdul-Kareem
Respondent: State of Vermont, Windham County State's Attorney's Office, Department of Mental Health and Superior Court Windham County
Case Number: 5:2021cv00005
Filed: January 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Presiding Judge: Geoffrey W Crawford
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Filing 5 JUDGMENT - The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Litigants (appeal period expires 4/9/2021)) (esb)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: There being no IFP application re-filed by the deadline of March 8, 2021, this case is Dismissed Without Prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 3/9/2021. (This is a text-only Order.) (jal)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may refile an IFP application together with a financial affidavit clearly stating his income, expenses, assets, and liabilities. Failure to file on or before 3/8/2021, shall result in dismissal of the case. In refiling his application, Plaintiff may also choose to amend his Complaint so that it sets forth a factual and legal basis for this court's jurisdiction, and so that it states a claim for which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 2/4/2021. (esb)
January 11, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PRO SE APPEARANCE by Misbah Abdul-Kareem. (esb)
January 11, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Misbah Abdul-Kareem. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Misbah Abdul-Kareem, #2 Proposed Complaint (image is sealed)) (esb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abdul-Kareem v. Superior Court Windham County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Windham County State's Attorney's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Mental Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superior Court Windham County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Misbah Abdul-Kareem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?