Phillip vs Schelhorn et.al
| Hamlet R Phillip, Jr. and Stephanie Phillip |
| Western Area Power Administration and Rhett J Schelhorn |
| 3:2019cv00072 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Virgin Islands |
| Curtis V Gomez |
| Ruth Miller |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Rhett J Schelhorn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Whalen, Marjorie) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time by Rhett J Schelhorn. (Whalen, Marjorie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Allen Kroblin on behalf of Defendant Rhett J Schelhorn (Kroblin, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Parties of Consent and Reference of A Civil Action to Magistrate Judge with a copy of Notice attached to each summons (KAB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Rhett J Schelhorn. (KAB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Western Area Power Administration Mark A. Gabriel Administrator and CEO (KAB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0391-808896.)filed by Stephanie Phillip, Hamlet R Phillip, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons 1, #3 Summons 2) (Jackson, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virgin Islands District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
