Hendricks v. Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001 et al
| Luke Hendricks |
| Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001 and Direct Insurance Group PLC t/a Aura Underwriting |
| 3:2019cv00081 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Virgin Islands |
| Curtis V Gomez |
| Ruth Miller |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (RM) setting Rule 16 Conference in Chambers before US Magistrate Judge Ruth Miller. (COUNSEL ARE DIRECTED TO REVIEW THE ORDER IN DETAIL AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS.) (AO)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001, Direct Insurance Group PLC t/a Aura Underwriting. (Duensing, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Duensing on behalf of Defendants Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001, Direct Insurance Group PLC t/a Aura Underwriting (Duensing, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Parties of Consent and Reference of A Civil Action to Magistrate Judge with a copy of Notice attached to each summons (KAB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Direct Insurance Group PLC t/a Aura Underwriting. (KAB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001. (KAB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0391-810820.)filed by Luke Hendricks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Aura, #3 Summons to Lloyd's of London) (Cattie, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virgin Islands District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hendricks v. Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001 et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luke Hendricks | |
| Represented By: | David J. Cattie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Certain Insurers and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing on Policy No. Aura17LukeH-1/1001 | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Duensing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Direct Insurance Group PLC t/a Aura Underwriting | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Duensing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
