Sprauve v. Starfish Market, Inc., et al
Phyllis Sprauve |
STARFISH MARKET, INC. and Albert Daniel |
3:2021cv00083 |
December 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Virgin Islands |
Ruth Miller |
Robert A Molloy |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration by Defendants Albert Daniel, Starfish Market, Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Ruth Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pre-Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit Employment Agreement, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Kronenberger, Gregg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY Re: #1 Complaint, The address information listed for counsel is inconsistent to the Court's records. Please review and provide the updated information in PACER so that it may accurately reflect on the docket and the Court's records. (EMK) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Parties of Consent and Reference of A Civil Action to Magistrate Judge with a copy of Notice attached to each summons (EMK) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Albert Daniel. (EMK) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Starfish Market, Inc. (EMK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AVIDC-972041.)filed by Phyllis Sprauve. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Starfish Market Inc. Summons, #3 Exhibit Albert Daniel Summons) (Bentz, Karin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virgin Islands District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.