Levitt v. Indelicato et al
Alfred Levitt |
Stephen Indelicato, Jennillee Beth Robinson and M/V St. Somewhere |
3:2022cv00055 |
August 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Virgin Islands |
Ruth Miller |
Robert A Molloy |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 HARD COPY NOTICE of filing Related Document: #14 sent via certified mail and return receipt to Alfred Levit. (TNS) |
Filing 14 ORDER (RAM) Plaintiff's requests as indicated in ECF #6 are DENIED. A copy of this Order shall be served on Plaintiff Alfred Levitt via first class mail. (SET) |
Filing 13 CERTIFIED MAIL return receipt Re: #12 Hard Copy Notice of filing (TNS) |
Filing 12 HARD COPY NOTICE of filing Related Document: #10 , 11 sent to Alfred Levitt via Certified Mail. (JC) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S APPROVAL OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO USE ELECTRONIC CASE FILING. Re: #9 Plaintiff Levitt shall abide by all the Court Rules, Orders, policies, and procedures governing the use of the electronic filing system. Moreover, in the event Plaintiff Levitt retains an attorney who appears on the party's behalf during the course of this action, the attorney must advise the Clerk of Court to terminate Plaintiff Levitt's registration as a Filing User upon the attorney's appearance. (EMK) |
Filing 10 ORDER (RAM) Alfred Levitt's Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, ECF #7 , is DENIED. (SET) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Permission to Use Electronic Case Filing by Plaintiff Alfred Levitt. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se ECF Registration Form) (IW) |
Filing 8 MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Alfred Levitt. (IW) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Alfred Levitt. (IW) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2022: #1 Exhibit Summons - Jennilee Beth Robinson, #2 Exhibit Summons - Stephen Indelicato) (IW). (Main Document 7 replaced on 9/13/2022) (IW). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits by Alfred Levitt re #1 Complaint LODGED with MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit under 46 U.S.C. 1916 Pending. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (IW) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Withhold Execution of Process on the Vessel MV St. Somewhere VI 5337-TC by Plaintiff Alfred Levitt. (IW) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #2 MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit under 46 U.S.C. 1916; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Alfred Levitt in support by Alfred Levitt. (IW) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint LODGED with Motion for leave to proceed as Seaman's Suit under 46 U.S.C. 1916 Pending, by Alfred Levitt. (IW) |
Filing 2 MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit under 46 U.S.C. 1916; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Alfred Levitt in support, by Alfred Levitt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (IW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephen Indelicato, Jennillee Beth Robinson (husband and wife) in personam, M/V St. Somewhere, a forty-eight (48) foot 1984 Carmargue CC bearing US Virgin Islands Vessel Registration No. VI 5337-TC, with twin Perkins 650 horespower engines and her apparel, appurtenances, tackle, equipment, etc., in rem, LODGED pending disposition of Motion for leave to proceed as Seaman's Suit under 46 U.S.C. 1916, filed by Alfred Levitt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (IW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virgin Islands District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.