Knox et al v. Emerald Beach Corporation et al
| Kyaisia Knox and Joshua El |
| Emerald Beach Corporation, Raekoi Evans and John Doe |
| 3:2024cv00012 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Virgin Islands |
| Ruth Miller |
| Robert A Molloy |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William E Crabill on behalf of Defendant Emerald Beach Corporation (Crabill, William) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Joshua El, Kyaisia Knox. Emerald Beach Corporation waiver sent on 2/28/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. (Hodge, Mark) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Raekoi Evans. (KW) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Emerald Beach Corporation. (KW) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE to Parties of Consent and Reference of A Civil Action to Magistrate Judge issued to plaintiff(s) Kyaisia Knox et al with a copy of Notice attached to each summons #3 , #4 . (KW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Civil Cover Sheet and Summonses by Joshua El, Kyaisia Knox (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - Emerald Beach Corporation, #2 Exhibit Summons - Raekoi Evans, #3 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet) (Hodge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Joshua El, Kyaisia Knox. (Hodge, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virgin Islands District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
