United States of America v. King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc
||United States of America
||King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc
||October 30, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
||Rosanna Malouf Peterson
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||31:3545 Action to Recovery Money
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 7, 2016
JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc. (TR, Case Administrator)
|September 17, 2015
ORDER DENYING KING MOUNTAIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, denying 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (LR, Case Administrator)
|July 27, 2015
ORDER REGARDING UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION TO STRIKE REPLY BRIEF, AND MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND; AND KING MOUNTAIN'S MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY denying 37 United States' Motion to Strike Repl y Memorandum; granting in part 14 United States' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim for Failure to State a Claim; denying with leave to renew 15 United States' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 22 United States' Motion to Str ike Jury Demand; striking 7 King Mountain's Jury Demand; denying 23 King Mountain's Motion for Discovery Defendants' Rule 56(d) Motion in Opposition to United States' Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 25 King Mountain's Motion for Discovery in Support of Defendant's Essential Right to Conduct Discovery. Signed by Chief Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (SK, Case Administrator)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?