Lukrich v. Cenlar, FSB
Plaintiff: Vicki Lukrich
Defendant: Cenlar FSB
Case Number: 1:2017cv03025
Filed: February 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Yakima Office
County: Kittitas
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The parties' Stipulation for Dismissal, ECF No. 10 , is APPROVED. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice without any costs to any party. FILE CLOSED. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (TR, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lukrich v. Cenlar, FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cenlar FSB
Represented By: Cara Christensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vicki Lukrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?