Aceves-Mendoza v. Cowan et al
| Armando Aceves-Mendoza |
| United States, Robert M Cowan, L Francis Cissna, Kirstjen M Nielsen, Kirstjen Nielsen, Lee Francis Cissna and United States of America |
| 1:2018cv03170 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Thomas O Rice |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # IFP). Filed by Armando Aceves-Mendoza.(LR, Case Administrator) |
Filing 2
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff seeks to file in forma pauperis a Complaint. Because it appears Plaintiff lacks sufficient funds to prosecute this action, the District Court Executive shall file the Complaint without payment of the filing fee. In addition, the District Court Executive shall set a case management review for 30 days, and immediately notify the assigned judicial officer, who will review the Complaint for legal sufficiency and determine whether to direct service. IT IS SO ORDERED. - Text entry; no PDF document. Case Management Deadline set for 10/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
|
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
