O.S. and M.R. v. Grandview School District No 200
| M.R. and O.S. |
| Grandview School District No 200 |
| 1:2019cv03187 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Rosanna Malouf Peterson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE : Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in via Teleconference before Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (MF, Courtroom Deputy) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by All Plaintiffs. (Abeyta, Terry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E McFarland, Jr on behalf of Grandview School District No 200 (Attorney Michael E McFarland, Jr added to party Grandview School District No 200(pty:dft))(McFarland, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Grandview School District No 200. (TR, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY against Grandview School District No 200 (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # 0980-3238237) Filed by O.S., M.R. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RG, Chief Deputy) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/15/2019 to redact personal identifiers of minors) (VR, Courtroom Deputy). |
| Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson assigned to case. (VR, Courtroom Deputy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
