Alves v. Yakima County Department of Correction et al
Plaintiff: David Michael Alves
Defendant: Yakima County Department of Correction and Bill Splawn
Case Number: 1:2021cv03120
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Yakima County Department of Correction. Party Bill Splawn added. Filed by David Michael Alves. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLP, Case Administrator)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO AMEND OR VOLUNTARILY DISMISS COMPLAINT - Plaintiff may file within 60 days of the date of this order an amended complaint or attached motion to voluntarily dismiss complaint or risk dismissal and a 'strike' under 28 USC 1915(g). Amended Complaint/Voluntary Dismissal Deadline set for 12/21/2021. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint Form - sent via U.S. Mail)(LMR, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD PAYMENT - application by plaintiff to proceed IFP is granted; an initial partial filing fee will be calculated and collected by Yakima County Department of Corrections (agency having custody of plaintiff). cc of Order and Acknowledgment/Authorization sent to agency. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (LMR, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
October 21, 2021 Filing 6 Letter from David M Alves to US Courthouse received 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Envelope) (LMR, Case Administrator)
September 20, 2021 Filing 4 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (LMR, Case Administrator)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Yakima County Department of Correction (Filing Fee $402, Receipt # IFP Pending) Filed by David Michael Alves. (Attachments: #1 Attachments to Complaint, #2 Transmittal Envelope)(LMR, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alves v. Yakima County Department of Correction et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Michael Alves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yakima County Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Splawn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?