Gratton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tahvio Gratton
Defendant: United Parcel Service Inc
Case Number: 1:2022cv03149
Filed: October 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Alexander C Ekstrom
Referring Judge: Thomas O Rice
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: A Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 1/12/2023 at 8:15 AM before Judge Thomas O. Rice. The parties' Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 12/29/2022. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (BF, Paralegal)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly A Holdiman on behalf of United Parcel Service Inc (Attorney Kimberly A Holdiman added to party United Parcel Service Inc(pty:dft))(Holdiman, Kimberly)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint for Damages by United Parcel Service Inc.(Reuben, Anne)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Anne Reuben on behalf of United Parcel Service Inc (Attorney Anne Reuben added to party United Parcel Service Inc(pty:dft))(Reuben, Anne)
October 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE by Tahvio Gratton re United Parcel Service Inc. (Shishido, Robin)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Clerk's ORDER OF RANDOM REASSIGNMENT. Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. TEXT-ONLY ENTRY; NO PDF DOCUMENT WILL ISSUE. This text-only entry constitutes the order or notice by the Court. (AY, Case Administrator)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service Inc. (SG, Case Administrator)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form. Please Note: Declination of Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Parties wishing to decline consent of this assignment must complete and return the attached Declination of Consent Form to the Clerk of Court by the Case Management Deadline set for 10/28/2022. (SG, Case Administrator)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against United Parcel Service, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-4141198) Jury Demand. Filed by Tahvio Gratton. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Shishido, Robin)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge Alexander C Ekstrom assigned to case. (SG, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gratton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tahvio Gratton
Represented By: Richard E Goldsworthy
Represented By: Robin J Shishido
Represented By: Jordan A Taren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service Inc
Represented By: Anne Reuben
Represented By: Kimberly A Holdiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?