Campbell v. Carpenter
| Glenn James Campbell and Glenn James Mollett |
| Eric Carpenter |
| 1:2022cv03160 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Stanley A Bastian |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FILING FEE/IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUIREMENTS ( Petitioner must either pay the full filing fee or comply with the in forma pauperis statute. ) Filing Fee due by 1/3/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form)(LAS, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.)
|
| Filing 4 Mail sent to Glenn James Campbell, Eastern State Hospital, 850 Maple Street, Medical Lake, WA 99022 was returned as undeliverable re #3 Letter to Prisoner. (LAS, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 Certificate Form for IFP) (LAS, Case Administrator) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 (IFP Pending). Filed by Glenn James Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Sealed Attachment, #2 Transmittal Envelope)(LAS, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
