Reno v. City of Yakima et al
James Reno |
City of Yakima, Brad Althauser and Jane Doe Althauser |
1:2022cv03183 |
November 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Alexander C Ekstrom |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Brad Althauser and Jane Doe Althauser)(LAS, Case Administrator) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent Form. Please Note: Declination of Consent Forms are not to be electronically filed with the Court. Parties wishing to decline consent of this assignment must complete and return the attached Declination of Consent Form to the Clerk of Court by the Case Management Deadline set for 11/28/2022. (LAS, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Reno ( Filing fee $ 402; Receipt # AWAEDC-4165663) Jury Demand. Filed by James Reno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for City of Yakima, #3 Summons Summons for Althausers)(West, Patrick) Modified on 11/18/2022 to remove duplicate name for cover sheet (LAS, Case Administrator). |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge Alexander C Ekstrom assigned to case. (LAS, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.