Richards v. Traditional Sporting Goods Inc et al
Brendan Yong Richards |
Traditional Sporting Goods, Inc.; Ardesa S.A., Traditional Sporting Goods Inc and Ardesa SA |
Greg Colburn |
William Squires |
1:2023cv03145 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Mary K Dimke |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Ardesa SA. (WMK, Case Administrator) |
Filing 9 Def. Traditional Sporting Goods, Inc's ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand. by Traditional Sporting Goods Inc.(Squires, William) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice, ECF Nos. #2 , #3 , #4 . Attorneys Anthony M Pisciotti, Clifford M Laney, and Danny C Lallis are hereby admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington in the above-captioned case on behalf of Defendant Traditional Sporting Goods, Inc. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.2(c), Defendant's local counsel of record shall sign all pleadings, motions, and other papers prior to filing, and shall meaningfully participate in this case. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the order of the Court. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (CV, Courtroom Deputy) |
Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Traditional Sporting Goods Inc. (Squires, William) |
Filing 6 State Court Documents received filed by Traditional Sporting Goods Inc Re #1 Notice of Removal, . (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Squires, William) |
Filing 5 State Court Documents received filed by Traditional Sporting Goods Inc Re #1 Notice of Removal, . (Squires, William) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Danny C. Lallis. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4378548. by William Squires. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2023 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Squires, William) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Clifford M. Laney. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4378542. by William Squires. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2023 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Squires, William) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Anthony M. Pisciotti. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4378526. by William Squires. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2023 Without Oral Argument before Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Squires, William) |
Reset Motion Hearing as to #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Clifford M. Laney. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4378542, #2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Anthony M. Pisciotti Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4378526, #4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Attorney: Danny C. Lallis. Filing fee $ 200, receipt number AWAEDC-4378548. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2023 Without Oral Argument before Judge Mary K. Dimke. (AY, Case Administrator) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Mary K. Dimke assigned to case. (AY, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Filing fee $402; Receipt #BWAEDC-4377800 Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Notice of Appearance, #3 Supplement Notice of Appearance, #4 Supplement Disclosure Statement, #5 Supplement Declaration)(Squires, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.