Knoeb v. Yakima Department of Corrections et al
Roy Castillo Knoeb, III |
Yakima Department of Corrections and Washington Correction Center |
1:2024cv03019 |
February 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Mary K Dimke |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FILING FEE/IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUIREMENTS. Plaintiff must either pay the full filing fee or comply with the in forma pauperis statute. Filing Fee due by 4/15/2024. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgment & Authorization Form)(CLP, Case Administrator Team Lead) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 3 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number and deficiency. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement & Authorization) (SG, Case Administrator) (Service of Notice on parties not registered as users of the Court CM/ECF system accomplished via USPS mail.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Yakima Department of Corrections and Washington Correction Center (Filing Fee $405, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Roy Castillo Knoeb, III. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Envelope)(SG, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.