Pakootas, et al v. Teck Cominco Metals, et al
| Joseph A Pakootas, Donald R Michel and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation |
| Teck Cominco Metals LTD |
| State of Washington |
| Citizens for Clean Columbia, Washington Public Interest Research Group, Washington Environmental Council, Citizens For A Clean Columbia, United States of America on Behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Interior and United States of America on Behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency |
| Teck Cominco Metals LTD |
| State of Washington, Joseph A Pakootas and Donald R Michel |
| 2:2004cv00256 |
| July 21, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Spokane Office |
| Ferry |
| Lonny R. Suko |
| Environmental Matters |
| CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response & Comp Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2869
ORDER DENYING 2838 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; re 2831 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative for Immediate Review. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (WMK, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2832
ORDER DENYING 2774 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (LAS, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2831
ORDER GRANTING 2777 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CULTURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TNC, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2827
ORDER GRANTING 2771 JOINT MOTION AS TO CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. Affirmative Defenses 10-16, listed in ECF No. 2117 , are DISMISSED. Affirmative Defenses 15-21, listed in ECF No. 2569 , are DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (BM, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2642
ORDER DENYING 2636 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TNC, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2635
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION; denying 2622 Plaintiff State of Washington's Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration; denying 2628 Defendant Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.'s Motion for Reconsideration; denying as moot 2630 Defendant's Motion to Expedite Hearing. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TNC, Case Administrator) Modified on 6/2/2023 clerical error (TNC, Case Administrator).
|
|
Filing
2624
ORDER DENYING 2597 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON RIPENESS. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TNC, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2617
ORDER GRANTING 2573 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; Plaintiff State of Washington's Seventh Cause of Action under the Model Toxics Control Act is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (TNC, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2566
ORDER DENYING 2506 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON TIME-BARRED CLAIMS. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A Bastian. (CLP, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2419
CIVIL JUDGMENT (AY, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2409
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - denying 2400 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (CC, Case Administrator)
|
|
Filing
2149
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, INTER ALIA , denying 2118 Motion for Reconsideration; and staying 2119 Motion to Modify Phase II Schedule. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (LR, Case Administrator)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
