Pickering v. Citibank National Association
Plaintiff: Jason Pickering
Defendant: Citibank National Association
Case Number: 2:2012cv00582
Filed: October 25, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Spokane
Presiding Judge: Lonny R. Suko
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 UNAUTHORIZED PUBLICATION OR USE OF COMMUNICATION
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; granting parties' 16 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice and District Court Executive is directed to close the file. Signed by Senior Judge Lonny R. Suko. (LE, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pickering v. Citibank National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Pickering
Represented By: Jon N Robbins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citibank National Association
Represented By: Russell D Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?