Peterson v. National Security Technologies
Plaintiff: Albert Ole Peterson
Defendant: National Security Technologies
Case Number: 2:2012cv05025
Filed: February 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Thomas O. Rice
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR NEW TRIAL. Denying 158 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. National Security Technologies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert Ole Peterson
Represented By: Jeffrey L Needle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Security Technologies
Represented By: James Michael Kalamon
Represented By: Shamus T O'Doherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?