Jones v. Butler Amusements Inc
Plaintiff: Cheryl Jones
Defendant: Butler Amusements Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv00136
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Spokane
Presiding Judge: Justin L. Quackenbush
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. (PL, Case Administrator)
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM RE: SETTLEMENT HEARING. Signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush. (PL, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Butler Amusements Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Jones
Represented By: Janelle M Carney
Represented By: Scott F Lundberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Butler Amusements Inc
Represented By: Mark G Beard
Represented By: John S Devlin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?