Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al

Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Thomas Bostick
Plaintiff: Columbia Riverkeeper
Case Number: 2:2014cv00030
Filed: January 21, 2014
Court: Washington Eastern District Court
Office: Spokane Office
County: Outside Washington
Presiding Judge: Lonny R. Suko
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33:1365
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Represented By: Mark A Nitczynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Bostick
Represented By: Mark A Nitczynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Columbia Riverkeeper
Represented By: Marc Zemel
Represented By: Richard Adam Smith
Represented By: Eric D Lowney(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Brian Alan Knutsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.