Mariano v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Daniel Mariano
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 2:2015cv00157
Filed: June 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Whitman
Presiding Judge: John T. Rodgers
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (VR, Courtroom Deputy)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING, IN PART, 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROPERLY SERVE COMPLAINT. Case Management Deadline set for 3/17/2016. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (JW, Operations Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mariano v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Mariano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?