McBride v. Confluence Health
Plaintiff: Amanda McBride
Defendant: Confluence Health
Case Number: 2:2016cv00243
Filed: July 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Chelan
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION. (TR, Case Administrator)
December 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 56 STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (TR, Case Administrator)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McBride v. Confluence Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Confluence Health
Represented By: Lewis W Card
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda McBride
Represented By: Corey Michael Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?