In re: James Elmer Mitchell and John "Bruce" Jessen v USA
Plaintiff: Suleiman Abdullah Salim, Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud and Ob Aid Ullah
Petitioner: James Elmer Mitchell and John Jessen
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2016mc00036
Filed: September 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Office: Spokane Office
County: Spokane
Presiding Judge: Justin L. Quackenbush
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER RE: MOTION TO RECONSIDER (ECF No. 32 ) Signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush. (LAM, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: James Elmer Mitchell and John "Bruce" Jessen v USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Elmer Mitchell
Represented By: Brian S Paszamant
Represented By: James T Smith
Represented By: Christopher W Tompkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Jessen
Represented By: Brian S Paszamant
Represented By: James T Smith
Represented By: Christopher W Tompkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Timothy Andrew Johnson
Represented By: Andrew Irwin Warden(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suleiman Abdullah Salim
Represented By: Emily Chiang
Represented By: Kate E Janukowicz
Represented By: Dror Ladin
Represented By: Lawrence S Lustberg
Represented By: Hina Shamsi
Represented By: Steven Watt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud
Represented By: Emily Chiang
Represented By: Kate E Janukowicz
Represented By: Dror Ladin
Represented By: Lawrence S Lustberg
Represented By: Hina Shamsi
Represented By: Steven Watt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ob Aid Ullah
Represented By: Emily Chiang
Represented By: Kate E Janukowicz
Represented By: Dror Ladin
Represented By: Lawrence S Lustberg
Represented By: Hina Shamsi
Represented By: Steven Watt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?