Murphy v. Sears
Plaintiff: Chelsea Murphy
Defendant: David Sears and Christopher Thimsen
Case Number: 2:2018cv00272
Filed: August 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Rosanna Malouf Peterson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; denying as moot but with leave to renew if Plaintiff files First Amended Complaint that is legally sufficient: #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #5 Motion to Obtain ECF Login and Password #7 Request for Oral Hearing. Amended Complaint Deadline set for 11/23/2018. Signed by Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. Copy of Order sent to Pro Se Plaintiff this date via US Mail. (AY, Case Administrator)
September 20, 2018 Filing 7 Request for Oral Hearing re #4 Complaint by Chelsea Murphy. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2018 Without Oral Argument before Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (AY, Case Administrator)
August 27, 2018 Filing 6 DECLARATION in Support of Jurisdiction Complaint of Chelsea Murphy re #4 Complaint. (AY, Case Administrator)
August 27, 2018 Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION to Obtain ECF Login and Password by Chelsea Murphy. Motion Hearing set for 9/26/2018 Without Oral Argument before Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (AY, Case Administrator)
August 27, 2018 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # IFP) Jury Demand. Filed by Chelsea Murphy.(AY, Case Administrator)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff seeks to file in forma pauperis a pro se Complaint. Because it appears Plaintiff lacks sufficient funds to prosecute this action, the District Court Executive shall file the Complaint without payment of the filing fee. In addition, the District Court Executive shall set a case management review for 30 days, and immediately notify the assigned judicial officer, who will review the Complaint for legal sufficiency and determine whether to direct service. IT IS SO ORDERED. - Text entry;no PDF document. Case Management Deadline set for 9/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk)
August 23, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel by Chelsea Murphy. Motion Hearing set for 9/24/2018 Without Oral Argument before Judge Rosanna Malouf Peterson. (AY, Case Administrator)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. Sears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Sears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Thimsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?