David v. Commissioner of Social Security
Matthew J. David and Matthew J David |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2019cv00015 |
January 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Thomas O Rice |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rudolf J Verschoor on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Attorney Rudolf J Verschoor added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Verschoor, Rudolf) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew J David re Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Madsen, Dana) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status. IT IS SO ORDERED. TEXT ONLY entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order or notice on the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers. (EW, Law Clerk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Fee Waived Filed by Matthew J. David. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Madsen, Dana) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice assigned to case. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.