United States of America v. Four firearms from various manufacturers, makes, models and assorted calibers et al
United States of America |
Four firearms from various manufacturers, makes, models and assorted calibers, $40,950.00 U.S. currency and 431 rounds of assorted ammunition |
2:2019cv00039 |
January 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Stanley A Bastian |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN by the U.S. Marshalls re Warrant of Arrest in Rem of $40,950.00 U.S. currency. (SG, Case Administrator) (SG, Case Administrator) |
Filing 3 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Warrant of Arrest In Rem. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (SG, Case Administrator) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant In Rem by United States of America. Motion Hearing set for 3/11/2019 Without Oral Argument before Judge Stanley A Bastian. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Warrant of Arrest In Rem)(Donovan, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem against All Defendants Fee Waived Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Donovan, Brian) |
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Stanley A Bastian assigned to case. (LR, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.